Archive for March 31st, 2008
Blogs, the Fifth Estate
When you write for a newspaper, there’s a certain degree of self-censorship that needs to happen by the time you gaze upon your finished product. I think Mike and Katherine especially will agree with me on this point (and Paul, if you’re reading this), since we all write for the paper to some news-ey degree. Travis has the luxury of writing his section full of his own opinion every week, Joe vents his issues in his edcomics, and Marc has made no bones about the fact that he never bothers to read anything the writers write, because we’re all a bunch of vain assholes. I won’t contest that fact, because he’s probably right.
As a trained graphic designer, he’s usually right about most things.
But he did say one thing that really upset me, although the crowd ate that shit up and actually applauded at his point.
I can quote this, because I’m a reporter!
RD: “I don’t think we should boycott the Olympics in China. I think, rather, we should work to make things very, very uncomfortable for the Chinese government, so it would make it harder for them to benefit from the Olympics in any meaningful way.” (emphasis mine)
Huh. So the plan is…what? To call China and breathe heavily into their phone? To write nasty things about their ambiguous sexuality on the bathroom wall? To go over there with a big chalkboard and drag our fingers across it?
Maybe it’s just my cold, shriveled walnut of a Conservative heart talking, but “very, very uncomfortable” doesn’t sound like the height of sophisticated global watchdog tactics. I mean, this is a guy who has seen some of the absolute worst human rights violations in history. He should be the FIRST to be angry that the Olympic commission gave the games to China, a country where:
-
no family is permitted more than one child,
-
the police ranks continue to beat down monks, and
-
Internet access is heavily censored.
Give me a break. Not to mention the fact that China has been on the US State Department’s list of human rights offenders right up until this year (another unforgiveable omission, but I won’t get into that now) and they government hasn’t been uncomfortable enough to change yet. Maybe I’m just a cynic, but I get this irritating little feeling that the Chinese government couldn’t give a sideways fart for what we think of their human rights track record.
I can’t understand it. Why are the Olympic Games so important that to boycott them in the interest of holding a major human rights violator accountable for their actions is so unthinkable? What do the Olympic Games really add to the larger social schema? Very little, except line the pockets of the host country - in this case a repressive Communist government that will not likely allow the citizens to see a single red cent of that money.
It was a wishy-washy moment with very little justification in the middle of an otherwise well-intentioned lecture.
In other news, this picture makes me laugh until milk comes shooting out of my nose.
*For the record and for any concerned Brock student who may read this, I continually strive to write/run the Internal News section in a fair and balanced manner with the utmost sincerity, and I loathe editorializing of any kind. I even ran a story on the Communist Party of Canada leader, for Christ’s sakes, so cut me some slack. I didn’t sleep well that night, I can tell you that.
4 comments March 31, 2008